Follow @Hallmark Abstract Service
For anyone unfamiliar with the New York City housing market, residents there tend to have three basic options particularly in Manhattan: Rent or buy a Co-Op or a Condo!
Yesterday in an article here we examined the median rents that are being charged in the various neighborhoods of New York City for both 1-BR and 2-BR apartments with Tribeca placing first in each category as the most expensive (Median 1-BR and 2-BR Rents By Neighborhood in New York City! (Maps)).
When it comes to buying, however, the market tends to be split between co-ops (75% of the market) and condos (25% of the market) with each having unique characteristics and challenges for potential buyers (and therefore the eager sellers as well).
Many have heard the story’s of celebrity buyers who have been turned down by co-op boards for a variety of factors including worries about paparazzi, aberrant lifestyle and crowds of fans among some of the top reasons for being voted down.
The Dakota on 72nd Street and Central Park West is famous (infamous) for having denied the likes of Cher, Billy Joel, Madonna, Carly Simon, Alex Rodriguez, Judd Apatow and Tea Leoni showing that merely having the price of admission does not guarantee it.
Courtesy of GlobalPost these are the fundamental differences between the New York City co-op and the New York City condo.
The global difference between condos and co-ops is simple: In a condo, you actually own your unit inside a multi-residence building, whereas in a co-op, you own a share of the corporation that owns the whole building, but your unit is actually leased to you by that corporation. The differences between condo and co-op ownership in New York City, however, is much more nuanced and is actively changing.
Since the 1980s, co-ops have dominated the Manhattan real estate market. It’s estimated that in the mid-1980s, co-ops constituted 85 percent of the market, but that percentage has dropped to about 75 percent in the current market. This percentage can be misleading, though, because co-ops are concentrated mainly in neighborhoods with older buildings. Neighborhoods with significant new construction may actually have more condos available than co-ops. So, when considering the differences between the two types of property, architecture is a significant factor. New construction will be sold mainly as condos, whereas pre-war buildings will most likely be sold as co-op shares.
Costs and Value
Condos are known to be more expensive in Manhattan, and this price difference goes beyond the sticker. The New York Times tells us that on the surface, condos can appear to be valued nearly 40 percent higher than co-ops — but that in actuality, a condo is only about 9 percent more valuable than a co-op unit of the same size. This gap between expense and value is linked to the added costs that are inherent to buying and maintaining a condo. A condo will usually be larger than a co-op with the same number of bedrooms, so a buyer is paying for that added square footage. Condo buyers also have to pay higher closing costs and a mortgage recording tax, neither of which are involved in a co-op purchase. Finally, co-ops allow the owner to write up to 50 percent of her maintenance fees — including insurance and property tax — off of her personal taxes. Condo maintenance fees, by contrast, are money that the owner will never get back.
The approval process to purchase a condo is very different than it is to purchase a share of a co-op. A qualified applicant for a condo cannot be rejected — only precluded from buying the unit if the condo board chooses to purchase the unit first on the same terms. This is known as the condo board’s “right of first refusal,” and it rarely happens. When applying to purchase co-op property, by contrast, a buyer must not only be approved by the bank, but also the board. In New York City, these boards are notoriously rigorous — even more rigorous than banks — when approving someone for a mortgage, and require full disclosure of assets, credit and financial history. Although some condo buildings are beginning to require more financial disclosure from potential buyers, overall the approval process for condos affords the applicant much more privacy.
Perhaps the biggest difference between co-ops and condos in Manhattan is the terms of ownership. Co-ops come with strict house rules — the first of which usually prohibits subletting. Co-ops enforce these rules to protect the residents from transient occupants. While some buyers appreciate this protection and the higher quality of life it provides, others find it too restrictive, and want their property purchase to allow them all the freedoms of private ownership. Thus the appeal of a condo, which affords the owner the right to sublet at will, and thus have the option to earn income on her property investment.
Please send your comments, questions, thoughts and ideas for new content to email@example.com!
Get new Hallmark Abstract Service articles directly into your in-box by clicking the Follow Tab in the bottom right-hand corner of any of our website pages!
Attorney’s and mortgage professional who have any questions about HAS or the way in which we conduct our business please contact HAS President Michael Haltman by phone at 516.741.4723 or by email at firstname.lastname@example.org
For buyers of Residential or Commercial Real Estate in New York City or Long Island or for anyone refinancing and existing mortgage learn how you can potentially save hundreds of dollars in closing costs with Hallmark Abstract Service! Click here to learn more.
Content created by Michael HaltmanGoogle+